Robust Implementation in Weakly Rationalizable Strategies
نویسنده
چکیده
Weakly rationalizable implementation represents a generalization of robust implementation to dynamic mechanisms. It is so conservative that virtual implementation in weakly rationalizable strategies is characterized by the same conditions as robust virtual implementation by static mechanisms. We show that despite that, (exact) weakly rationalizable implementation is more permissive than (exact) robust implementation in general static mechanisms. We introduce a dynamic robust monotonicity condition that is weaker than Bergemann and Morris’ (2011) robust monotonicity condition and prove that it is necessary, and together with weak extra assumptions sufficient for weakly rationalizable implementation in general dynamic mechanisms. We demonstrate that sometimes even weakly rationalizable implementation in finite dynamic mechanisms is more permissive than robust implementation in general static mechanisms.
منابع مشابه
Robust Rationalizability under Almost Common Certainty of Payoffs
An action is robustly rationalizable if it is rationalizable for every type who has almost common certainty of payoffs. We illustrate by means of an example that an action may not be robustly rationalizable even if it is weakly dominant, and argue that robust rationalizability is a very stringent refinement of rationalizability. Nonetheless, we show that every strictly rationalizable action is ...
متن کاملAspects of Rationalizable Behaviour
Equilibria in games involve common “rational” expectations, which are supposed to be endogenous. Apart from being more plausible, and requiring less common knowledge, rationalizable strategies may be better able than equilibria to capture the essential intuition behind both correlated strategies and forward induction. A version of Pearce’s “cautious” rationalizability allowing correlation betwe...
متن کاملNoisy Evolution in Normal Form Games
This paper analyzes a stochastic model of evolution in normal form games. The long-run behavior of individuals in this model is investigated in the limit where mutation rates tend to zero, while the expected number of mutations, and hence population sizes, tend to infinity. It is shown that weakly dominated strategies do not survive evolution. Also strategies which are not rationalizable in the...
متن کاملRationalizability and Mixed Strategies in Large Games∗
We show that in large games with a finite set of actions in which the payoff of a player depends only on her own action and on an aggregate value that we call the (aggregate) state of the game, which is obtained from the complete action profile, it is possible to define and characterize the sets of (Point)Rationalizable States in terms of pure and mixed strategies. We prove that the (Point-)Rat...
متن کاملA Revelation Principle for (Boundedly) Bayesian Rationalizable Strategies
The revelation principle is reconsidered in the light of recent work questioning its general applicability, as well as other work on the Bayesian foundations of game theory. Implementation in rationalizable strategies is considered. A generalized version of the revelation principle is proposed recognizing that, unless agents all have dominant strategies, the outcome of any allocation mechanism ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2013